ChillDoubt

Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Travelodge site #165234

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    Why not the Groves? Kill two birds with one stone before it becomes an even longer saga about an eyesore than it already is?

    in reply to: Listing of the Police Station #164564

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    Who suggested this?
    Stevie Wonder?

    Whichever clown did needs a check-up from the neck up, most idiotic suggestion I’ve heard in along time.

    in reply to: Shamima Begum: IS teenager #164286

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    Hmm, it’s always funny how the loony, liberal left claim that she was a young, foolish and impressionable girl who was duped and didn’t really know what she was doing, yet yesterday a ‘child’ just one year older was convicted of unimaginable horrors inflicted on a poor innocent.
    In this country, at the age of 14 you assume full criminal responsibility for your actions, whatever they may be.
    She knew full well what she was getting into and relished the journey she was about to make. She had the mouse, gumption and determination to reach ISIS territory in Syria and ensured she stayed there.
    Fast forward 4 years and now it’s turned sour she has, in a cold and calculating
    manner decided to attempt to return to UK in a flagrant misuse of the trappings of citizenship that she rescinded the minute she left these isles of her own free will to join a terror-driven regime.
    Let her seek to follow her religion and its Stone Age ideals in a Muslim country or let her rot in the refugee camp.
    Either way, her face should never darken these shores again.

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161835

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    ChillDoubt, once again, apologies with the spelling. I am confused though. If you look back at the previous posts you will see that I haven’t said that you struggle with this, struggle with that, lack the intelligence, etc. In fact, if you look properly you will see that it is katy who has posted that about me.
    —————————-
    I know they weren’t aimed at me, I was just pointing out your general condescending manner and attitude with all posters.
    Furthermore, if you’re going to hand out grammar/spelling lessons you might want to look at some of the ‘Americanised’ words and their selling that have been evident in your posts.
    Just sayin’.

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161773

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    Although wrong I’d allow rounding up ( I presume you know what rounding up means). But they couldn’t and just keep digging a hole for themselves.
    Now back to you. Whats with the personal attacks against me. I struggle with this, I struggle with that, I lack the intelligence…. which is quite laughable but also sad that you should stoop so low. Says a lot about you I’m afraid
    ————————
    LOL, condescending, aloof and positively rude.
    Of course you’re nothing to do with the council…….

    P.S. It’s ChillDoubt, note the double l.

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161739

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    katy,
    Thanks for your excellent and informative post.
    Oddly, I too have my suspicions about Bigbrother, given the vehemence of his/her posts and stance in this.
    I assumed almost immediately that they are indeed a council employee but one specifically tasked to monitor and firefight any threads regarding scrutiny of our beloved council.
    Glad it’s not just me then…..!

    As for the apology I’m not holding my breath.

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161717

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    *is not

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161716

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    Big brother,
    No, this thread is it the only place where I’ve made a ‘wild’ claim about 8,000.
    Maybe you’d care to look again?

    Visitors down before parking charges says Councillor – day after stating there was an ‘expected’ drop due to new fee

    If you’re struggling, I’d advise paying particular attention to the tweets.

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161702

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    And rather than deflect the question and try to be clever do you agree with me that your headline of Parking Down By 8,000 is incorrect ?
    —————————
    Frankly no, I don’t agree, it’s in line with the story posted on Wrexham.com

    As for trying to be clever, take it as you will but you really need to:
    A. Reel back the condescending manner.
    B. Ease off on the capitals(shouting doesn’t validate your argument, plus using the big letters doesn’t accentuate it either)and
    C. Take a chill pill and address your anger issues, it’s just a forum not Speakers Corner!

    in reply to: Parking Down By 8,000 At Country Parks #161659

    ChillDoubt
    Participant

    What the headline should read is visitor numbers down 8,000 REGARDLESS of whether parking was payable or not.
    ———————
    But it states that the drop was expected as a result of the charges, so your paragraph in that respect is incorrect.

Content is user generated and is not moderated before posting. All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and Wrexham.com does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information displayed. The views expressed on these Forums and social media are those of the individual contributors.
Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact Wrexham.com .

More...

West End queen packs her running shoes for Llangollen Eisteddfod return!

News

Urgent calls for Welsh Water improvement amid environmental concerns

News

Mental health charity and Chirk café join forces to raise awareness of suicide prevention

News

70-year-old completes Wrexham 10k after overcoming mobility challenges

News

North Wales Police volunteers celebrated at awards ceremony

News

North Wales Police’s new Stalking Co-ordinator enhancing victim support

News