shiftingspace
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
[quote quote=151226]
The gag order to which I referred applied to every media organ in England and Wales. From eminent national publications like The Daily Mail to provincial rumps like Wrexham.com, no distinction is made under the law.
‘Quick Robin, to the Batmobile and break out the UBERFOIL’
[/quote]With your clumsy attempt at comedy, are you trying to suggest that no such gag order was in place?
This is not really in dispute. Many newspapers have documented it, and a copy, pictured below, has been in circulation since it was imposed.
And here is the judge presiding over the grooming case, grinning from a second story window, as Tommy was forced into the back of a police van.
[quote quote=151196]Tommy Robinson is a dick & this thread is bullshit. My tuppence on the matter.[/quote]
Listen to yourself.
You’re so divorced from natural justice, so wedded to Cultural Marxist dogma, that you celebrate the unjust imprisonment of a man who had done nothing more than report upon the sentencing (there was no jury to prejudice!) of a foreign gang of statutory child rapists.
What has the man ever done to deserve so much scorn? I’ll wager you don’t even have a reason to loathe him. You’ve simply been conditioned to reflexively respond in this way.
All of you who have reacted in the same fashion, like well-trained dogs, need to understand that you’ve been played like mugs; you’ve been tricked into transferring your natural allegiance for your countrymen to an alien, ethnocentric group who seek to subjugate you.
Ponder why that might be.
My thanks for sparing my posts the usual treatment of summary deletion and even deigning to address them, however ineptly.
[quote quote=151158]
I do quite like the idea we are now big enough to be part of a ‘state-enforced media blackout’ though, and have globalist masters.
[/quote]It’s not a question of size, my dear, but of jurisdiction. The gag order to which I referred applied to every media organ in England and Wales. From eminent national publications like The Daily Mail to provincial rumps like Wrexham.com, no distinction is made under the law.
[quote quote=151158]
Can you provide some links to back that up, as I have had a quick search of Bellevue Park incidents and that is demonstrably untrue.
[/quote]Why narrow the scope to just Bellevue Park? I am given to understand that the usual purview of reporting is of the general area of Wrexham and the name of the site is, accordingly, wrexham.com – not bellevuepark.com.
Nevertheless, it is beyond my powers to prove, conclusively, that you or the local police are selectively withholding details of criminal suspects in the service of multi-culturalism (more accurately multi-racialism). Suffice it to say, however, that not once have I seen mention of a suspect of visible ethnic appearance in any of your coverage, in spite of the obvious advantage it would have in apprehending them.
Furthermore, I know from personal experience that you are discriminatory in your moderation of the forums, permitting unkind remarks about our Irish cousins but removing the same when said about Afro-Caribbeans or Asians.
Perhaps you can provide some clarity on that point. Is it only people from the British Isles that can be the subject of complaint, or are white Europeans more broadly fair game?
Who knows? Perhaps the local black population are more well behaved than their kin in the Big Smoke where, in 2010, they constituted 12% of the population and accounted for about 60% of violent crime, making them eleven times more likely to perpetrate such an offense than the rest of the population, or an over-representation of about 1,000% [1]. Incidentally, this is a trend that more or less holds worldwide, and persists even after controlling for socioeconomic status, which in itself is a dubious qualifier, given that there is a common factor, namely intelligence, which to a great extent underlies both.
[quote quote=151135]You’ve moved this from a story of two boys bikes being stolen, made a wild leap of non-substiantied faith to say it was, I’m assuming Muslim thieves, and then moving it further along to Tommy Robinson and child-grooming?
Okaaayyyyyy.
Rob, if there is a safe way of shutting this thread, shouldn’t it be done so. These words I’m reading here seem to be full of hate to me.
(Edit to add this reply is obviously meant for the OP)[/quote]
I neither believe nor suggested that the robbers were adherents of Islam. Do not falsely attribute to me misapprehensions which you have arrived at by deficiencies in your own ability to read and comprehend.
For the benefit of those like Fugazi3973 who are a touch on the dim side, I shall make it clear that the purpose of this thread was to draw attention and register my disgust with the rank dishonesty of suppressing highly pertinent information from stories, particularly reports of crime, when it conflicts with your ideology.
I mentioned Tommy Robinson because it is yet another instance, albeit more high-profile, of the establishment covering up uncomfortable truths for ideological reasons.
In this case, I have it on good authority that the thugs who carried out this crime were of African descent. Do you not think it would be useful and conducive to their apprehension for the public to be aware of this?
In other reports of crime in the area, neither the police nor Rob have shown any reticence in providing a description of the suspect when they were white.
Why is this information only systematically omitted when the offender is not white?
