HMO plans rejected for second time over parking concerns

Plans to convert a property on the outskirts of Wrexham town centre into a house in multiple occupation (HMO) have been refused for a second time.

The proposals to turn a three-bedroom house on Oxford Street, which is close to Eagles Meadow, into five bedsits were originally submitted in October.

But they were rejected by planning committee members in December amid fears the plans will add to existing parking issues.

Speaking at a planning meeting earlier this week the planning officer explained that the revised plans included new vehicular access and a driveway at the side of the property.

He said: “The maximum standards for existing property would generate a maximum requirement of three spaces, none of which are provided off-road at the moment because the property doesn’t have an off-road parking space.

“Applying the same guidance for HMOs, the property would require a maximum of four spaces. The difference is the potential increase of one space.

“The developer has proposed a single off-road parking space so the potential for on road parking is exactly the same as would be the case under the existing use. So the proposal does not put any additional pressure in terms of on-street parking.”

However Smithfield councillor Adrienne Jeorrett said that although she “recognises the need for low cost housing” the development would increase the existing parking problems in the area.

Ruabon councillor Dana Davies questioned whether the proposals to add a driveway to the side of the property was just moving the problem elsewhere.

Cllr Davies said: “You’ve said they’re benefiting from one additional parking space, but if we’re taking one car off the road to park it on the drive, then that car can’t park on the road as would be blocking access to drive. I don’t get see where additional one space extra is.

“Can someone explain what the benefit is, because we’re back to the same place whether there’s a drive there or not. If you’re talking a driveway for one parking space then one just replaces the other.”

Highways officer Peter Douthwaite said: “At the moment there is no parking space there at all, they take their chance wherever they park on the road, as there is no dedicated off-road parking for anyone.

“By providing one off-road, we’ve taken the view that the shortfall in parking for HMO is now equivalent as the existing dwelling. It’s difficult to justify refusal on those grounds.”

The planning officer added that there would be “no net increase in on-street parking.”

The committee voted in favour of refusing the application due to concerns over inadequate parking in the area and the proposed development compounding the issue.

*Picture: Google – property pictured far right