CerysHughes
Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@Insp Paul Wycherley 19260 wrote:
I thought I have answered the question fully. Please be specific and I will oblige. Alternatively ring 101, ask for me personally and I am happy to discuss.
Paul Wycherley
The question was how many police hours could have been spent instead on paying Swift, not if it was a good idea or not employing them.
You didn’t answer this one either…
#AreThePoliceWastingTooMuchOfTaxPayersMoneyWriting PatronisingHashtags?
@Insp Paul Wycherley 19250 wrote:
From Paul Wycherley:
The data that we receive back from Swift is vitally important to us. They contact victims of crime and seek feedback on the service we provided to them. At the end of the day we are a public service and are striving for service excellence and so feedback is a good measure of our performance and the public’s contentment with us.We also use the findings to improve!
It is essential that we employ an independent company to research and compile the data to ensure that the public have confidence that the data is unbiased in any way.
We are investing internally in improving quality of service by contacting victims of crime far more frequently to update them on the progress of issues reported to us. The fact that we were not performing well in this regard was as a direct result of information supplied in the surveys and has helped us significantly raise our performance in this important area.
From Hugh Jones:
The recent consultations was the most extensive ever carried out by Wrexham Council and has a statistical accuracy in excess of 90%.
We intend to develop and improve on the consultation for the next budget.
With regard to the suggested reorganisation of Local Government. The Welsh Government has got itself in a mess. There is absolutely no clarity about what they are seeking to do. One thing is clear that they intend to transfer more powers to Cardiff Bay at the expense of local democracy and this must be resisted. There is no democratic consent for unclear and potentially dangerous changes.
Neither have answered the questions:
disappointing.
I think in context of helping Wrexham AFC, Mr Ian Lucas did himself proud.
However in terms of a legislator looking after Wrexham’s interests he has acted to a detriment that is even worse than the rabble of councillors.
1. GATT Doha & Bali rounds – By supporting these and his colleague Lord Mandelson, it’s now cheaper and prosperous for companies to shut up shop rather than keep factories open and instead build factories in countries where labour is three to ten times cheaper – This has by far had the greatest impact on the manufacturing industry in wrexham and jobs than any other event. e.g. where did the solar panel factory go?
2. Similar EU Trading agreements – By supporting these, it’s now cheaper for a certain supermarket to get rid of local dairy product manufacturer purchase milk themselves, send it over to the czech republic get it manufactured there and ship it back to sell here.
3. His role in freeing up the financial industry that resulted in the great recession and being part of an administration that didn’t save for that rainy day. Wrexham is still suffering with this because of the 50 million austerity cuts that the council is putting through.
4. He voted for zero hour contracts.
n.b. If he had been a tory MP, it would have been the same result.
5. He chose not to vote for a fracking moratorium.
5. But most of all Ian Lucas voted for IRAQ and surprise suprise earlier this month he was champagned and dined as a guest of an italian arms dealer Finmeccanica that was one of the top ten firms to profit from the Iraq War. (just google Ian Lucas champagne arms dealer.)
#ToInspectorWycherley
Team Taylor or Team Harry?
How many extra NWP police hours could have been spent instead of NWP paying Yorkshire Based Market Research Company “Swift Market Research” to interview victims of crime?
#AreThePoliceWastingTooMuchOfTaxPayersMoneyWritingPatronisingHashtags? :)
To Hugh Jones
Made in Chelsea or TOWIE?
Can you provide documental evidence that recent consultations and surveys such as the council budget were scientifically & statistically tested for both validity and reliability BEFORE the public were given opportunity to complete them?
Why couldn’t the public be consulted or given a referendum on whether they want to merge with other county councils. In my mind a merger is a foolish decision, but this is supposed to be democracy and the public deserve to be heard and give a mandate to their councillors.
