This is horrifying, and shows a great lack of understanding by those who authorised this surveillance. Its not just what is known, its also the discreet questions and work that may be done and not recorded. What is spent on this activity, do we now monitor the magistrates grants of surveillance, do those grants conform to the Act and the remit of terrorism and serious offences, are the people carrying these out properly experienced, trained and monitored. Is this proportionate, and how does it compare with policy activity and policy, and comparable government agencies.