Posted: Thu 21st Sep 2023

Report ‘typo’ sees Shropshire council accidentally vote for £95m North West Relief Road cost increase

Wrexham.com for people living in or visiting the Wrexham area
This article is old - Published: Thursday, Sep 21st, 2023

Shropshire councillors have accidentally voted to support £95 million of extra borrowing towards Shrewsbury’s North West Relief Road after the figure was mistakenly included in a report.

The vote across the border took place at a meeting of Shropshire full council today and, despite not committing the authority to taking out the loan, has sparked a backlash from critics who have questioned why such a glaring error was not picked up.

It has also raised concern over whether the true cost of the scheme has more than doubled from previous estimates of £87m to an eye-watering £182m.

The council has said, however, that the “holding” figure quoted in the report was not a true estimate. It has been asked to clarify where the amount came from.

At the meeting at Shirehall, councillors were asked to approve changes to this year’s capital stratey – a list of one-off projects and infrastructure schemes that are funded separately from day-to-day services, usually through sale of assets, grants and borrowing.

Included in the list of projects appended to the report, though not referenced in the report itself, was £95.3m of borrowing to plug a “funding gap” in the cost of the North West Relief Road.

This was queried by councillors who said they had not been given any new information about why more money was needed on top of that which had been previously agreed.

Liberal Democrat group leader Councillor Roger Evans said: “It is time to stop, review the project and really look at this and how the council is doing it.”

Labour group leader Councillor Julia Buckley said: “We are being asked to find an extra £95m with no information.

“Basically they don’t know the details or the costs, but you are being asked today to find £95.3m.”

Councillor Buckley said repaying the loan at current interest rates would mean another £5m of service cutbacks every year to fund the repayments.

She said: “This means cutting our basic services to the bone so that we can find some money to pay off a debt for a road that nobody wants.”

Councillor Dan Morris, cabinet member for highways, said claims that nobody supports the road were “baloney” and accused opposition councillors of being “anti-democratic”.

He said the full business case would be prepared if and when planning approval is granted, with a decision expected next month.

But it was only after councillors voted through the changes to the capital strategy that the blunder was picked up.

In an email to Green group leader Councillor Julian Dean, director of finance James Walton admitted he was “confused” when the figure was mentioned in the debate as he was not aware it was on the list.

He said: “This row should have been deleted, it was missed, and I apologise.

“Early drafts of the spreadsheets apparently included holding figures for a number of items that were considered for inclusion in the report.

“This one should have been deleted and is clearly not referred to in the report as it was left in erroneously – hence the confusion.”

He added that the figure was “not an estimate of cost”.

Councillor Evans said he would ask for an emergency meeting to be called so the matter could be discussed again.

He said: “Up until now, when asked many times what the estimated cost was for the NWRR, officers have refused and said they are unable to do it until after the planning application is agreed.

“Here we have a figure submitted by officers as an updated figure for the NWRR.

“Why was this not given to members beforehand, and why has Shropshire Council continued to spend £24 million [to date] doing work when there is, at present, no way that the road can be afforded?

“£95m extra cost for Shropshire Council is not acceptable.”

Councillor Buckley said it was “shocking” that the report had been voted through with the £95m wrongly included.

She said: “The opposition parties all voted against such expenditure but the Conservatives voted blindly to spend this additional £95.3m without understanding it, questioning it, or having any information about it.

“It now transpires to be a typing error – imagine voting that level of expenditure without caring whether it is needed or not.”

Councillor Dean said it was concerning that questions raised ahead of the vote about the “typo” were “ignored”.

He added: “But just as importantly, where did this draft figure come from?

“Is this what officers really think will be needed in borrowing to build the road?

“That is a huge and completely unsustainable increase. It’s time to stop this financial madness and call off further work on the road.”

Lib Dem councillor and transport campaigner Rob Wilson said had been asking for an updated cost estimate since he was elected in 2021, to no avail.

He said: “Today at council the Conservatives proposed taking out a £95m loan to make up an unspecified funding gap.

“I asked why they would need £95m for an £87m road and was not given an answer.

“It appears that the NWRR is a blank cheque pet project whilst every other council budget faces cuts.”

Campaign group Better Shrewsbury Transport (BeST), which wrote to the council earlier this week to request a formal investigation into the project, said the latest debacle was further evidence for abandoning the scheme.

Group spokesperson Emma Bullard said: “BeST has been warning for several years that the NWRR can’t be achieved for its original £87m price tag.

“Today Conservative councillors voted through a £95m budget increase for the NWRR on top of the original £87m.

“It beggars belief that they did this on the basis of an erroneously published figure without any proper scrutiny.

“This fiasco only strengthens our call for the council’s monitoring officer to launch a ‘section five’ investigation into the maladministration of this project.”

(BBC LDRS service)



Spotted something? Got a story? Email [email protected]



Have a look at...

Investigation launched after silent soldier memorial vandalised

First ever Wrexham City Carnival and Wrexham Proms in the Park taking place tomorrow!

Trevor Arms to close its doors for final time this weekend

Appeal after car stolen from supermarket car park

“Ministers are responsible for their own data” say First Minister as questioned again over Blythyn sacking

Wrexham graduate becomes first female Special Constable to carry Taser in North Wales

Residents hit out at “confusing” cuts to village bus service

Opioids leading factor in drug-related deaths in Wales

New grant funding to re-energise Wrexham city centre buildings

A view from Wrexham’s Member of the Senedd

Swing into the 1940s with D-Day Darlings at Bellevue Park!

Nation.Cymru confirms Flintshire politician was not source of leaked messages