[thewayneinspain]

Originally Posted by angryShopper

Can you prove it?

Yes and if someone else asks I provide links and screengrabs.

However I don't believe anyone on this board should treat seriously someone who has made 20 unproven slurs about the town or it people as well as using bad language.

[cmaj76]

Does every thread on here have to end up like this? It's getting a bit tedious now!

[thewayneinspain]

Originally Posted by cmaj76

Does every thread on here have to end up like this? It's getting a bit tedious now!

But that's the aim of angryShopper. Slur wrexham, use bad language doing so and stop anyone from pulling him up on it. Meaning you have to deal with him like a little child, ignore the attention seeking until it stops. It's quite frustrating but all internet forums have this problem. I guess because people can hide behind anonyminity.



Cllr Paul Rogers has now emailed me but has dodged questions.

He has been evasive with his answering.

He was not willing to reference where & how in the planning guidelines he cannot answer the questions in the other thread.

I don't understand this as thereis no way he would be allowed to do that in law skeleton argument.

It's very disappointing he is behaving like this. It's only a secondary issue mind you. However, I think when a politician whom has been voted in by democracy, but is not willing to explain why they won't be part of the democratic process & debate, it should be pointed out. But this is the politics of the UK of the last few generations; soundbite, jargon, don't clarify or justify what they mean.

[angryShopper]

Originally Posted by thewayneinspain

But that's the aim of angryShopper. Slur wrexham, use bad language doing so and stop anyone from pulling him up on it. Meaning you have to deal with him like a little child, ignore the attention seeking until it stops. It's quite frustrating but all internet forums have this problem. I guess because people can hide behind anonyminity.



Cllr Paul Rogers has now emailed me but has dodged questions.

He has been evasive with his answering.

He was not willing to reference where & how in the planning guidelines he cannot answer the questions in the other thread.

I don't understand this as thereis no way he would be allowed to do that in law skeleton argument.

It's very disappointing he is behaving like this. It's only a secondary issue mind you. However, I think when a politician whom has been voted in by democracy, but is not willing to explain why they won't be part of the democratic process & debate, it should be pointed out. But this is the politics of the UK of the last few generations; soundbite, jargon, don't clarify or justify what they mean.

This is libellous you really should provide evidence

[thewayneinspain]

Originally Posted by angryShopper

This is libellous you really should provide evidence

Then paul rogers can sue. He has my details as does the forum moderator whom has my permission to give the my details out, should a letter from paul rogers' solicitor enquire. Let's remember the councillor studied law at university, so if he should have the expertise to know if there was a winnable case, if there is, he should sue.

If someone else asks I'll provide details. However I don't believe anyone on this board should treat seriously someone like you [angryShopper] who has made 20 unproven slurs about the town or its people as well as using bad language.

[angryShopper]

Originally Posted by thewayneinspain

Then paul rogers can sue. He has my details as does the forum moderator whom has my permission to give the my details out, should a letter from paul rogers' solicitor enquire. Let's remember the councillor studied law at university, so if he should have the expertise to know if there was a winnable case, if there is, he should sue.

If someone else asks I'll provide details. However I don't believe anyone on this board should treat seriously someone like you [angryShopper] who has made 20 unproven slurs about the town or its people as well as using bad language.

Your dodging the issues and not providing any prove this is one sided

[thewayneinspain]

Originally Posted by angryShopper

Your dodging the issues and not providing any prove this is one sided

If someone else asks I'll provide details. However I don't believe anyone on this board should treat seriously someone like you [angryShopper] who has made 20 unproven slurs about the town or its people as well as using bad language.

simply, you need to get someone else to ask me. Or if no one asks, you have to address your 20 plus unproven slurs and apologise for your bad language. you need to act like a grown up to be treated like one. .

[angryShopper]

Originally Posted by thewayneinspain

If someone else asks I'll provide details. However I don't believe anyone on this board should treat seriously someone like you [angryShopper] who has made 20 unproven slurs about the town or its people as well as using bad language.

simply, you need to get someone else to ask me. Or if no one asks, you have to address your 20 plus unproven slurs and apologise for your bad language. you need to act like a grown up to be treated like one. .

PROVE IT , stop dodging the issuse, all you can do is post shit and troll everyone on here calling them liars,

[thewayneinspain]

Originally Posted by angryShopper

PROVE IT , stop dodging the issuse, all you can do is post shit and troll everyone on here calling them liars,

as my previous post...
simply, you need to get someone else to ask me. Or if no one asks, you have to address your 20 plus unproven slurs and apologise for your bad language. you need to act like a grown up to be treated like one. .

please act like an adult. Bad language does not make you look big.

[Rob]

Going to close this off - and for those with direct debates there is a 'private message' function you can use