Est. 2011
Read 969,977 times in last 30 days *

Go Back Forums > Forums > Wrexham & Surrounding Area Forum

Wrexham & Surrounding Area Forum Discussion of things in and around Wrexham.

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By 99DylanJones
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-14-2014, 07:45 AM
wxm wxm is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 534
Default Wrexham's Budget

The reporting about the next budget for Wrexham, does not show or suggest that all spending be listed i.e. 230m, that the benefit or outcome be listed against each amount spent, and a 'new and fresh' approach and attitude is taken to setting the budget, for 2015/6. This should be done?

This would be a positive way forward, and may alleviate depressing discussion about cuts. The first question surely, is in a changed world, can we do it differently and with less money.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2014, 08:00 AM
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 534
Default Re: Wrexham's Budget

I cannot understand a very simple maths issue in respect to the Council and budget cuts;

If you have to make 45m cuts over 5 years and you start in year one with a 9m cut in Year 1 then over 5 years you have saved the 45m -- 5 x 9

Why then is there another 4m for 2015/16 and then the same in subsequent years?

Do we all need to go back to school or do the sums these days just dont add upo the same as they did when I was in school.

Clr King has also made a statement that it will be 10 years before the Council is back to a position we have had over the past 20/30 years-- where is this man coming from a) the past is the past and you cant keep going back b) where are all of these millions going to come from c) do the public want everything from the past to be brought back.

If we have the Lead Finance Member talking like this then we surely must be doomed...
Jill likes this.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2014, 11:09 AM
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 357
Default Re: Wrexham's Budget

I am not sure where you get the figure of 4 million from Dylan or how you are able to extrapolate that figure to cover a 5 year period. The reporting by and the figures presented to the Exec Board are at variance with each other, ie states 8.2 million saving over a 2 year period whereas the report presented indicates a necessary saving of 8.2 million for 2015/16, (para 2.1). Extrapolate that figure and you reach a figure of 41 million over a 5 year period, if we use your simplistic mathematical
calculation method. I tend to favour the official documentation for accuracy.
Also, the proposed savings indicated in the appendix to the report are are presented previously (with minor additions) and form the basis for early and ongoing consultation and amendment as necessary throughout this financial year, prior to budget setting in early 2015.
As for wxm's comments regarding a 'new and fresh approach' and 'doing things differently and with less money', isn't that what is being done by considering the budget early and allowing longer for consultation to take place?
As an aside, would you please try to discontinue the use of inappropriate question marks in your posts? It makes your normally difficult to read posts even more so.
Reply With Quote
Old 05-14-2014, 03:01 PM
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 623
Default Re: Wrexham's Budget

I suspect that the real debate is where should the cuts actually come from rather than how much and that is where everyone needs to put pressure if they have concerns
Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2014, 09:43 PM
wxm wxm is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 534
Default Re: Wrexham's Budget

In earlier posts the budget for this year was listed and debated. The total spend is to be 227,333,600.

'General' expenditure is to be 26,959,059.

Could general expenditure be reduced by the 4.3m in the Council report?
Reply With Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information displayed.
The views expressed are those of the individual contributors and not necessarily those of .
IP addresses and other information of contributors together with dates and times of access are stored.

Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 AM. - - Top

1 2 3