Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Yeah, don’t get me started on ‘women’ who are in their 20s and 30s going on to be 12 years old.
Ooooooh disney, pokiemon – GROW UP!!!!!!!!
Ergh no thanks. I have a proper job ta.
Clearly you are ‘talking’ utter nonsense.
It is not my fault or problem that you idiots cannot read properly or understand simple concepts.
Bless.
Seriously, you idiots should not be allowed to vote.
No, I am saying you are idiots.
A trend is determined by the lowest multiple change i.e. a weekly basis.
There is no weekly upward trend. The weekly trend has been variable for 2017.
I have no idea where they get you idiots from.
What utter nonsense. There is no upward trend whatsoever. There is a variation during this year i.e. my initial post.
Any increase on a weekly basis would be seasonal.
There is no upward trend.
“There are ‘encouraging signs’ that footfall in Wrexham is experiencing an upward trend with over 77,000 visits to the town centre in a single week in July.”
Since the figures that are provided are on a weekly basis. This statement is incorrect. Just as your replies are.
Reading and writing clearly are not for you.
What do you find so difficult to understand? You confuse yourself. They are relating the weekly basis of this year. You previously related year on year. They are DIFFERENT comparisons.
Now you are relating this year’s footfall when 50% are down and 50% are up. That is NOT AN INCREASE in footfall.
Springboard are claiming that there has been an increase on a weekly basis. THERE HAS NOT BEEN.
STICK TO THE DAY JOB.
? Your statement ‘Generally, the turnover figures, if they tally with others, would suggest Springboard might be correct.’ is obviously incorrect.
They are stating that there has been an increase in footfall this year. When there clearly has not been.
You state the relationship between two different years and even then it has been not increasing for 50% of those weeks.
Hence, both you and Spring Board are obviously incorrect.
