Forum Replies Created
Charlotte asks: “Whenever we call the police about houses/garages being broken into, they take 20+ minutes to turn up. By then they have gone. Saves them filling paperwork I suppose, and less paperwork means that Inspector Wycherley can state that the burglary rate has fallen ‘dramatically’… If they were catching these thieves the first time there’s a call to them, it might save 5 or 6 houses being burgled and people not losing their stuff to junkies.”
Wayne asks via Facebook: ” Could they also address the youths hanging around splash magic and smoking weed and drinking alachol. Use the section 27 laws. Bring in SLO. And also threaten the parents of these with eviction. Yet its just a walk by and wave. Pro active stops it. Sends the right message. The section 27 now exclusion orders should be made more and when breached dealt with.”
Carrie via Facebook asks: “Could the police please address the drug addicts hanging around the Co Op on Poplar Road on a Wednesday afternoon after getting their scripts at Pen Y Bryn Chemist. They’re swapping and selling both their prescription drugs and other things in broad daylight whilst mums are collecting children from St Giles school.”
Those are the ones posted (so far) on the forums, so I will now put up the ones that have come in via Facebook / Twitter and email….
Lisa asks: “The recent spate off burglaries in the areas have been worrying there seems to have been a big increase lately are you increasing foot patrols as they seem to be taking place in the day times ?”
Just pulling in the picture we tweeted up so you can see the live answers being written:
Likely to be 20-25,000 extra houses up there as they fill up the green belt.
I wonder if these developments are being factored into the developments in wrexham and associated demand.February 12, 2015 at 7:34 pm in reply to: Waterworld Replacement Unaffordable + Bodhyfryd Plans #72261
Interesting point on the facebook page by Steve Hale “Total Fitness about to invest in their new major sports and recreation facility close by” – you can’t include that in the plan, not everyone can afford £35+ a month and it can’t take the volume of children that want to swim in school holidays etc.”
It will be interesting to see what gets mentioned in scrutiny on this.
Started a new thread on it – http://www.wrexham.com/forums/wrexham-surrounding-area-forum/1512-waterworld-replacement-unaffordable-bodhyfryd-plans.html as more detail has been given this afternoon.
I THINK every post should have an early word capitalised, as apparently that draws peoples attention to writing. Or so it seems in print!
One odd moment to me was at the start on a discrepancy on the previous meetings minutes.
Rather than agreeing to review the view and take the lead from what has been recorded, an amendment was voted on and passed to adjust based off memory.
It is highly likely still accurate, but with the facility there it did seem odd :D
Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact Wrexham.com .