Rob, I was not suggesting your report was incorrect, indeed the report merely repeated what a Councillor said. Unfortunately I assume it was a slip of the tongue when the figure of 10.9% was used instead of 10.9 days. The actual report would have been available to everybody at the meeting, so I assume nobody felt the need to correct what was said. My comment was aimed at the poster who used the figures as an excuse to make disparaging remarks, (one specifically but incorrectly aimed at me), without actually checking the facts beforehand. Mike