Forum Replies Created
I know people love to slate the town but I feel things are looking positive lately
In what way if you dont mind me asking? I hope so because I enjoy living in the wrexham area.
KidA you could be right
Why should the Council Tax payers subsidise this event? Why were children not charged a nominal amount to help finance the event?
I am in full agreement with bubble and zinger here, one day of fun provided by the council which by the description
“I took my grandchildren to of one the first playdays on Llwyn Isaf & Queens Square & thought what a fantastic event it was. The equipment consisted of lengths of wood, huge cardboard boxes, sheets of vinyl, bales of hay & water. ” does not sound like it has cost a huge amount of money, and provided a lot of fun, so to Mr Barclay, well done, to Councillor X, well words fail me.
I wonder how much that fiasco cost?
The council should be saving money for use on critical services not wasting it on entertaining the children of people who cannot be bothered looking after them during the holidays.
They should put them all in Ty Pawb because nobody else uses it!
Maybe the parking fees from councillors could pay for this?
I’m not sure if Darland does have a problem, I think the problem is more widespread, and in this instance happens to involve Darland. Certainly friends whose children attend local schools have similar experiences, but maybe not quite as extreme as this. I really don’t know what a school can do other than try to show just how it can affect people, but the people posting things like this probably never see the real hurt. Has anyone really found a way to control social media?
Due to the lack of charging points, both locally and nationally, if any are fitted at the Guildhall then they should be available to everyone.March 7, 2018 at 9:58 am in reply to: Shame on Councillors to refuse planning permission #145860
I’ve a full set of pre-planning documents relating to this.
To be honest I’d be very concerned if it got approved.
Just the last week or so we’ve seen examples of planning applications that don’t reflect the intended purpose of properties.
This site has poor access, with weather and traffic issues, which were glossed over in the documents, along with many other factors that contribute to it being a poor choice of site for something of this nature.
The plans also appear to indicate it’s not designed as a purely low risk unit, despite what might be being said.
The document didn’t instil any confidence in the company concerned.
If the application had been refused on the legitimate points you have raised above, then fine. You have identified issues which are a potential problem, and they should be brought before the planning departmet.
However I fully agree with Matt & Councilwatcher, some of the comments made were shocking, and i think the councillors themseleves need to really look at the comments made. I have a family member who has some mental health issues and unfortunately it is not something easily fixed but with help and support they are getting better.
One thing I would like to say is many thanks to Councillor Frank Hemmings for the following, and I am sure both Matt & Councilwatcher would say the same.
Cllr Frank Hemmings was the only committee member who challenged remarks made, saying: “Some are levelling these people as dangerous and possible criminals. They are people who need help and support, we should not assume all are dangerous to children, we should be helping these people.”
Again, Thank you Mr Hemmings.
I wonder if you get free parking at the Guildhall?
Maybe we can market them as boating lakes when this happens?
Complaint? Please use the report post tools or contact Wrexham.com .