If Cllr Mark Pritchard is advocating the webcasting of all scrutiny meetings to highlight disingenuous behaviour, then he is basically calling into question decisions made by councillors in the past (and even occurring now) and implying they may not have been in the best interests of the general public. Of course this could just be a political rouse to try and discredit his adversaries, but more transparency is always welcome.
Now, this further calls into question the need for part 2 sections of meetings, as members of the public/press are excluded from the content of these in any way, shape or form. Is this an questioning of disingenuous behaviour an admission that part 2 meetings are an overwhelming abuse of public office to carry out biddings not in the best interests of Wrexham and effectively allowing the making of decisions without scrutiny from anyone.
If it is the case that they wish to make all scrutiny public meetings webcast so people can see their local councillors working for them (or against) and remove disingenuous behaviour, then it is time that all part 2 sections of meetings were banned.