Parliament not Prorogued
-
Posts
-
[quote quote=174576]I don’t agree with the Court’s decision.
Can we have another Court case please.
After we have argued about it for three years of course![/quote]I am failing to understand what law was broken.
Afterall all laws are acts of parliment and as such are debated and as such is ameded via Lords back to Head of state to sign as Law.So what law was broken ?
Lying well thats every politican then so they all break the law.
If its Constituantal law we dont have a written constitunecy.If its for stoppng parliment debating they had 3 years
What law was broken ?
It’s constitutional and administrative law – parliamentary sovereignty – look it up.
The law says that Parliament is sovereign, a dictator like Johnson doesn’t get to leapfrog it with a bespoke prorogue.
[quote quote=174576]I don’t agree with the Court’s decision.
Can we have another Court case please.
After we have argued about it for three years of course![/quote]The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land and the final arbiter of legal disputes, so no, you can’t.
I am failing to understand what law was broken.
Afterall all laws are acts of parliment and as such are debated and as such is ameded via Lords back to Head of state to sign as Law.So what law was broken ?
Lying well thats every politican then so they all break the law.
If its Constituantal law we dont have a written constitunecy.If its for stoppng parliment debating they had 3 years
What law was broken ?[/quote]
Black’s Law Dictionary defines unlawful as “not authorized by law, illegal.” Illegal is defined as “forbidden by law, unlawful.” Semantically, there is a slight difference. It seems that something illegal is expressly proscribed by statute, and something unlawful is just not expressly authorized.3 Sep 2007
This is the official definition of illegal and unlawful. The Supreme Court was clear that the Prime Minister’s action was unlawful. They did not use the word illegal. This is because we do not have a written constitution.And the Government and Labour said they would honour the Referendum result.
MPs voted 498 to 114 to invoke article 50 and leave the EUSSR.
With a deal Without a deal whatever.[quote quote=174581]I am failing to understand what law was broken.
Afterall all laws are acts of parliment and as such are debated and as such is ameded via Lords back to Head of state to sign as Law.So what law was broken ?
Lying well thats every politican then so they all break the law.
If its Constituantal law we dont have a written constitunecy.Thanks for sarcastic comment.
Suggest you look up Dictator. Usually unelected ( Johnson was Elected )
And usually the highest number of sests won in a parliment by a party would normally lead thats democracy
Would you not agree?
If its for stoppng parliment debating they had 3 years
What law was broken ?[/quote]
Black’s Law Dictionary defines unlawful as “not authorized by law, illegal.” Illegal is defined as “forbidden by law, unlawful.” Semantically, there is a slight difference. It seems that something illegal is expressly proscribed by statute, and something unlawful is just not expressly authorized.3 Sep 2007
This is the official definition of illegal and unlawful. The Supreme Court was clear that the Prime Minister’s action was unlawful. They did not use the word illegal. This is because we do not have a written constitution.[/quote][quote quote=174578]It’s constitutional and administrative law – parliamentary sovereignty – look it up.
The law says that Parliament is sovereign, a dictator like Johnson doesn’t get to leapfrog it with a bespoke prorogue.[/quote]
Thanks for the defonation.
Leave was never going to be easy- you can’t unbake a cake. But people are mistaken if they think 31st October will be the end, as that will only be the start of years of trade negotiations to re establish trade deals, not only with the EU but with the rest of the world. Many companies have already set up offices etc in the EU ready to trade after Brexit.
I don’t know about Boris breaking the law but there are multiple crimes against the English language on here.
[quote quote=174535]Corbyn hasn’t found the “money tree” he has found a “money forrest” if he is to carry out half of the promises he made in his conference speech. Promised the world but no facts about where all the money will come from![/quote]
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
